外贸质量,全球贸易通有人听说过吗？外贸推广看上去很不错的样子

凡是网络的外贸推销都必须建立在已经打开外贸市场的前提下，如果你们的产版品还没有进入国际市场权，人员也没有操作过国际贸易，完全没有国际贸易的经验，即便是在网上推销，也不会得到很好的效果，或者说完全不会有效果。

我找了一篇,然后你用goole 或随便什么的翻译一下!
不知道有用否.
在者.你可以先找中文的然后翻译!ok!

After a steel war, auto war and beef war , global trade war has evolved into a tug of war over textiles in 2005. China assumes a key role in the ongoing trade war due to its in the exports of textile products. Chinese producers'' ability to and export textiles gives rise to every-growing trade friction as well as every-rising vigilance from their American . China Daily quoted an article (China''s rise raises questions about free trade) in an American newspaper on June 16, 2005. This article adopts the pragmatic American view and argues that the United States should adjust its policy on free trade in view of China''s rapid rise.
After World WarⅡ,with the support of major developed countries, including the United States and other economic power across the world , the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade(GATT)/the World Trade (WTO) was set up.(WTO replaced GATT formally on January 1,1995.) The of GATT/ WTO lays a solid for the present-day world trade system which regards free trade as its ultimate objective. America is the primary of this world trade system. A study from America shows, the living standards of American people has been raised by 10% or so. The United States has gained from the brought by economic , such as less expensive imported , growing and and upgrading.
The Untied States has also benefited from Sino-Us trade. China''s trade surplus with the U.S., which is likely to continue for many years, will not bring about or exert a damaging impact on US economy. Foreign-funded in China, which mainly to China''s U.S.-trade surplus, have accounted for a big chunk of China''s export volume, with a of above 50%. , foreign-owned companies have paid the lion''s share 80% of the total export volume of China''s high-tech . For example, the export volume of personal computers in China amounted to 60 billions US dollars in 2004, and China retained its trade surplus. However,at least 3/4 of the profits of a computer goes to American which research and develop software, design chip and sale the complete set of computer. The true story behind China''s trade surplus with the U.S. is that American have pocketed much of the earnings and Chinese only have got modest economic returns.
China''s rise is to , trade and the thriving domestic market of the United States. Thanks to and dauntless efforts made by Chinese people from all sectors of the society, China''s economy is at a dizzying pace. Compared with other country, China enjoys a huge domestic market and its economy is of a grand scale. China has emerged as a world factory. The United States keeps up its guard against China''s fast-paced with a sense of . So that the United States is seeking to hinder china''s rapid and hold high the banner of trade .
Therefore, the question we will study here is whether a retreat to the trade is a wise choice for the United States? What are the of such an American approach on Sino-US trade as well as the world trade?
In fact, America has never given up or abrogated the policy of trade and free trade has never been virtually realized. The broke out in the United States in the early 19th, in an effort to met the brought by Britain products and fueled the of American homegrown . The United State raises its tariff . American average tariff rate has rose to 40% in 1824 from the somewhere between 7.5%-30% in 1816. This has also surged to 45% in 1825, posing another sharp increase. Thanks to the of the policy of trade , American industry was far ahead of others within the global reach in the 80'' of the 18th.
Since China joined the WTO, the United States has adopted a tougher policy of trade towards China in a step-by-step fashion. A series of make-or-break measures have been outlined and adopted , for example The of high duties on imported steel, anti-dumpling cases against China-made and the of quota on China- textiles. ...... All of above-mentioned issues give full _ to the fact that the United States has earnestly a policy of trade .
The question we are facing is whether the surging American trade will lead the world economy and trade into a blind alley? Compared with the world of the late twentieth century, today''s world is far from stable and tranquil. For example, the financial market is a fragile one, the WTO have almost reached a stalemate, is being replaced by , among the economic powers in the global market is white-hot and the gap between the rich and the poor keeps growing day by day. How much the side effects of the rises of trade will add to the of global economy is still A mystery. However, we must be aware of the fact that trade war is emerging as an active factor.
Whether the of the policy of trade will reduce the trade deficit of the United States and address the problems on its home front is still unclear. Trade is not at all a newly started thing and maybe not a panacea. The United States has been in imposing on Japan- . As a result, the pressure from the U.S. has forced Japan to become a player in the arena. Japan ends up with a world-top automaker.
The author regards free trade, the objective of WTO, as a mirage, and does not thing that free trade is . However, the of trade may be .
The between free trade and never stops and will run through the entire history of world trade. As China rapid economic growth it is nature for the United States to adopt a policy of towards China.
China should be prepared for the adverse trade and the condition which is unlikely to take a turn for the better in the years ahead. Therefore, we ought to learn how to strive to survive under the every- pressure.
When settling the trade disputes between China and the United States, America should seek to maintain the stability of world economy and safeguard our win-win situation. The United States should also be made aware that China will not cave in the face of American or be led by the nose. China, a world factory, will find a way out of the trading climate. The United States needs to have a better of the fact that America benefits a lot through Sino-US trade. America will lose a low-priced suppiier base and a vast market, if America impairs and hurts its relations with China.
Dan Ikenson, an US trade policy analyst says, if the United States begins to impose tariffs and penalties on China, it would have a negative effect on consumers in the US. "It''s just a rash idea that would be ruinous to our economy," he said, doubting seriously that the tariffs would ever be imposed. "It''s not going to help anybody, it will hurt a lot of people though."
China also has to go through a rethink of the ongoing trade war. China has paid a costly price for its success in gaining accession to WTO in a long period of 15 years and has been compelled to open its door to the outside world . We have heeded lessons from American policy of that we should put equal emphasis on the of market opening policIes and self-. We ought to create a strategic space for the with strength and safeguard our own interests in the course of settling every single trade dispute.
The minister of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce Bo Xilai announced on May 30, 2005, to the public media around the world that China will not make any to the United States and will squarely address the trade friction with the United States in textiles. China''s approach will be viewed as an turning point in the Chinese history of trade which featured every-expanding opening. This also is the response given by China when China faces the changes caused by American over free trade.
The author hopes that the world trade system does not move into an period of . , the writer makes a wish that the trend of trade will be and the global welfare can be raised .
(张晓璐译)

By Eliza Patterson
"It is getting ugly" is a phrase used with frequency in the United States to describe the surge in China-bashing in the US Congress. The frenzy of activity in the Congress is the result of anxiety about the surging economic power of China and its expanding sphere of influence. Congress sees China as an export-driven giant racking which as a result of such unfair practices as currency has racked up an enormous and growing trade surplus with the US at the expense of US industry and workers. Even more troubling to Congress is the fact that China has over $650 billion in foreign exchange reserves. The fear is that China will use these assets to buy up important and strategic US assets. China''s bids for Maytag, IBM and most recently Unocal are a threat to US national security.
Faced with this picture the Congress has taken a number of actions- none of which have any actual force as of now. It has drafted but not passed that would impose a surcharge on all Chinese imports to counter what is viewed as an yuan; that would bar the US Export-Import Bank from providing a $ 5 billion credit package to support a bid by to build nuclear plants in China; that would bar the US Treasury from using funds to approve the Unocal sale to Cnooc; and passed a non-binding concern that the Cnooc sale would threaten US national security.
While these measures clearly conflict with the long-standing liberal trade agenda of the United States, they do not signal a retreat from the policy of open trade. In fact many have pointed out the between the current reaction to China to the anxieties created in the 1980s by the seemingly rise of Japan. Then too alarms went off and some measures were taken. In the end however, the US remained firmly committed to liberal trade, pushing for greater in the Uruguay and Doha Rounds and the of multiple free-trade . Then as now the retreat from liberal trade was based on anxiety about one specific trading partner not about the of open trade generally. And the now as then is targeted at just one trading partner and comes largely from just one branch of the US - Congress. The remains firmly committed to liberal trade and there is little risk that will engulf US trade policy; or even US policy vis- a- vis China.
This is not to say the does not have numerous about China. It does, ranging from China''s failure to protect property to its policy of pegging the yuan to the dollar. But, as US Commerce Secretary Gutierrez said recently, the Bush prefers to and does not think that new tariffs and other barriers are the right answer to address US concerns.
The US Congress would be well advised to consider the adverse impact its measures would have not only on US- China relations but also on US in pushing for market world wide. It should listen to the many serious analysts who say the claims that Cnooc''s bid for Unocal threatens national security are unfounded. They should listen to the expert '' of the potential adverse effects of a rapid move to a free floating yuan. And they should consider the impact on US consumers of increased tariffs on Chinese imports.
For its part China must recognize that much of the US public and a number of US members of Congress are uneasy about the of China''s important role in the global economy. China should try to US anxieties and should seek to work with the US to alleviate those concerns. While the heated rhetoric coming from Congress is indeed "ugly", it should not be seen as an of a shift in US liberal trade policy or even of as an effort to isolate China or keep it off the global stage. Rather, the Congress, under pressure from segments of the public, is seeking changes in specific Chinese policies and practices that they regard as unfair if not WTO-illegal.
China would be best served by seeking to negotiate a solution with the Bush to US regarding the yuan, property and Chinese barriers to US exports. in which China agreed to move gradually toward a free floating yuan , to improve its of property rights and to remove at least some of the alleged barriers to US exports would almost certainly restrain threats.
If with the do not yield a mutually solution, or if China refuses to enter at all, it can be expected that the US will retaliate by placing limits on some Chinese exports and perhaps denials of some Chinese in the US. Such action would be and a step backward from the long-standing US goal of global liberal trade. It would not, however, signal a shift in US trade policy.
If the US does take such actions China should take full advantage of its WTO and pursue a WTO complaint against the US. My guess is that if China won such a case the US would, after much agonizing, remove any WTO- illegal barriers because the remains firmly committed to global trade and the rule of law as in the WTO.
While segments of the US public and the US Congress are currently enamoured with China-bashing and threats of abound, US trade policy remains firmly in support of liberal trade, including with China.

对外贸易量是指以固定年份为基期而确定的进出口价格指数，去除与同期的进出口额而得出的按不变价格计算的贸易额，其反映的是该国或该地区贸易实际规模的发展变化情况。

女装库存尾货批抄发没有最便宜只有更便宜的，原因如下：
一是：我国是一个服装产业大国，国内很多厂家连市场调查都没有做就匆匆上线产货，生产的服装可能由于价格、款式、色彩、季节、地域等原因滞销，形成库存，前几年很多服装厂家由于不会处理库存而陷入资金紧张，有的甚至导致破产关门的大有人在。
二是：一些服装厂家盲目加班加点生产，导致生产出来的服装不合格，产品卖不出去，形成大量库存。
三是，由于中国入世后，国外定单逐年增加，由于外贸定单很严格，如果有很小很小的一点点瑕疵就又可能导致退单，形成库存！
四是：还是外贸的，接到国外定单，对方交了预定金，但是，后来由于种种原因违约不要了，形成库存。这个也就是所谓的”外贸原单“
五，由于国外做的服装要求比较严格，为防止生产的产品有部分不合格产品，厂家故意增加部分产品数量，以待发现有问题时可以调换用，如果产品完全合格，增加的那些就成了库存，也就是现在所谓的“外贸尾货”
六：由于服装行业的特殊性，不管什么服装，什么国家，什么服装厂家都会有库存。